30 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			30 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.1 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
| ; RUN: llvm-as <%s | llvm-bcanalyzer -dump | FileCheck %s
 | |
| ; Check that distinct nodes break uniquing cycles, so that uniqued subgraphs
 | |
| ; are always in post-order.
 | |
| ;
 | |
| ; It may not be immediately obvious why this is an interesting graph.  There
 | |
| ; are three nodes in a cycle, and one of them (!1) is distinct.  Because the
 | |
| ; entry point is !2, a naive post-order traversal would give !3, !1, !2; but
 | |
| ; this means when !3 is parsed the reader will need a forward reference for !2.
 | |
| ; Forward references for uniqued node operands are expensive, whereas they're
 | |
| ; cheap for distinct node operands.  If the distinct node is emitted first, the
 | |
| ; uniqued nodes don't need any forward references at all.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; Nodes in this testcase are numbered to match how they are referenced in
 | |
| ; bitcode.  !3 is referenced as opN=3.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK:       <DISTINCT_NODE op0=3/>
 | |
| !1 = distinct !{!3}
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT:  <NODE op0=1/>
 | |
| !2 = !{!1}
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT:  <NODE op0=2/>
 | |
| !3 = !{!2}
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; Note: named metadata nodes are not cannot reference null so their operands
 | |
| ; are numbered off-by-one.
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT:  <NAME
 | |
| ; CHECK-NEXT:  <NAMED_NODE op0=1/>
 | |
| !named = !{!2}
 |