59 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			59 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
| Motivation
 | |
| ==========
 | |
| 
 | |
| One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one
 | |
| to easily create and test complex environments.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching
 | |
| ASICs, as their ports can not be migrated to other network namespaces
 | |
| (NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL) and most of them probably do not support the
 | |
| L1-separation provided by namespaces.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, a similar kind of flexibility can be achieved by using VRFs and
 | |
| by looping the switch ports together. For example:
 | |
| 
 | |
|                              br0
 | |
|                               +
 | |
|                vrf-h1         |           vrf-h2
 | |
|                  +        +---+----+        +
 | |
|                  |        |        |        |
 | |
|     192.0.2.1/24 +        +        +        + 192.0.2.2/24
 | |
|                swp1     swp2     swp3     swp4
 | |
|                  +        +        +        +
 | |
|                  |        |        |        |
 | |
|                  +--------+        +--------+
 | |
| 
 | |
| The VRFs act as lightweight namespaces representing hosts connected to
 | |
| the switch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This approach for testing switch ASICs has several advantages over the
 | |
| traditional method that requires multiple physical machines, to name a
 | |
| few:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Only the device under test (DUT) is being tested without noise from
 | |
| other system.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. Ability to easily provision complex topologies. Testing bridging
 | |
| between 4-ports LAGs or 8-way ECMP requires many physical links that are
 | |
| not always available. With the VRF-based approach one merely needs to
 | |
| loopback more ports.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These tests are written with switch ASICs in mind, but they can be run
 | |
| on any Linux box using veth pairs to emulate physical loopbacks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Guidelines for Writing Tests
 | |
| ============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| o Where possible, reuse an existing topology for different tests instead
 | |
|   of recreating the same topology.
 | |
| o Tests that use anything but the most trivial topologies should include
 | |
|   an ASCII art showing the topology.
 | |
| o Where possible, IPv6 and IPv4 addresses shall conform to RFC 3849 and
 | |
|   RFC 5737, respectively.
 | |
| o Where possible, tests shall be written so that they can be reused by
 | |
|   multiple topologies and added to lib.sh.
 | |
| o Checks shall be added to lib.sh for any external dependencies.
 | |
| o Code shall be checked using ShellCheck [1] prior to submission.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. https://www.shellcheck.net/
 |