262 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			262 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			HTML
		
	
	
	
| <html>
 | |
| <head>
 | |
| <title>pcre2perform specification</title>
 | |
| </head>
 | |
| <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#00005A" link="#0066FF" alink="#3399FF" vlink="#2222BB">
 | |
| <h1>pcre2perform man page</h1>
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE2 index page</a>.
 | |
| </p>
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| This page is part of the PCRE2 HTML documentation. It was generated
 | |
| automatically from the original man page. If there is any nonsense in it,
 | |
| please consult the man page, in case the conversion went wrong.
 | |
| <br>
 | |
| <ul>
 | |
| <li><a name="TOC1" href="#SEC1">PCRE2 PERFORMANCE</a>
 | |
| <li><a name="TOC2" href="#SEC2">COMPILED PATTERN MEMORY USAGE</a>
 | |
| <li><a name="TOC3" href="#SEC3">STACK AND HEAP USAGE AT RUN TIME</a>
 | |
| <li><a name="TOC4" href="#SEC4">PROCESSING TIME</a>
 | |
| <li><a name="TOC5" href="#SEC5">AUTHOR</a>
 | |
| <li><a name="TOC6" href="#SEC6">REVISION</a>
 | |
| </ul>
 | |
| <br><a name="SEC1" href="#TOC1">PCRE2 PERFORMANCE</a><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Two aspects of performance are discussed below: memory usage and processing
 | |
| time. The way you express your pattern as a regular expression can affect both
 | |
| of them.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <br><a name="SEC2" href="#TOC1">COMPILED PATTERN MEMORY USAGE</a><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Patterns are compiled by PCRE2 into a reasonably efficient interpretive code,
 | |
| so that most simple patterns do not use much memory for storing the compiled
 | |
| version. However, there is one case where the memory usage of a compiled
 | |
| pattern can be unexpectedly large. If a parenthesized group has a quantifier
 | |
| with a minimum greater than 1 and/or a limited maximum, the whole group is
 | |
| repeated in the compiled code. For example, the pattern
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   (abc|def){2,4}
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| is compiled as if it were
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   (abc|def)(abc|def)((abc|def)(abc|def)?)?
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| (Technical aside: It is done this way so that backtrack points within each of
 | |
| the repetitions can be independently maintained.)
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| For regular expressions whose quantifiers use only small numbers, this is not
 | |
| usually a problem. However, if the numbers are large, and particularly if such
 | |
| repetitions are nested, the memory usage can become an embarrassment. For
 | |
| example, the very simple pattern
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   ((ab){1,1000}c){1,3}
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| uses over 50KiB when compiled using the 8-bit library. When PCRE2 is
 | |
| compiled with its default internal pointer size of two bytes, the size limit on
 | |
| a compiled pattern is 65535 code units in the 8-bit and 16-bit libraries, and
 | |
| this is reached with the above pattern if the outer repetition is increased
 | |
| from 3 to 4. PCRE2 can be compiled to use larger internal pointers and thus
 | |
| handle larger compiled patterns, but it is better to try to rewrite your
 | |
| pattern to use less memory if you can.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| One way of reducing the memory usage for such patterns is to make use of
 | |
| PCRE2's
 | |
| <a href="pcre2pattern.html#subpatternsassubroutines">"subroutine"</a>
 | |
| facility. Re-writing the above pattern as
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   ((ab)(?2){0,999}c)(?1){0,2}
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| reduces the memory requirements to around 16KiB, and indeed it remains under
 | |
| 20KiB even with the outer repetition increased to 100. However, this kind of
 | |
| pattern is not always exactly equivalent, because any captures within
 | |
| subroutine calls are lost when the subroutine completes. If this is not a
 | |
| problem, this kind of rewriting will allow you to process patterns that PCRE2
 | |
| cannot otherwise handle. The matching performance of the two different versions
 | |
| of the pattern are roughly the same. (This applies from release 10.30 - things
 | |
| were different in earlier releases.)
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <br><a name="SEC3" href="#TOC1">STACK AND HEAP USAGE AT RUN TIME</a><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| From release 10.30, the interpretive (non-JIT) version of <b>pcre2_match()</b>
 | |
| uses very little system stack at run time. In earlier releases recursive
 | |
| function calls could use a great deal of stack, and this could cause problems,
 | |
| but this usage has been eliminated. Backtracking positions are now explicitly
 | |
| remembered in memory frames controlled by the code. An initial 20KiB vector of
 | |
| frames is allocated on the system stack (enough for about 100 frames for small
 | |
| patterns), but if this is insufficient, heap memory is used. The amount of heap
 | |
| memory can be limited; if the limit is set to zero, only the initial stack
 | |
| vector is used. Rewriting patterns to be time-efficient, as described below,
 | |
| may also reduce the memory requirements.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| In contrast to <b>pcre2_match()</b>, <b>pcre2_dfa_match()</b> does use recursive
 | |
| function calls, but only for processing atomic groups, lookaround assertions,
 | |
| and recursion within the pattern. The original version of the code used to
 | |
| allocate quite large internal workspace vectors on the stack, which caused some
 | |
| problems for some patterns in environments with small stacks. From release
 | |
| 10.32 the code for <b>pcre2_dfa_match()</b> has been re-factored to use heap
 | |
| memory when necessary for internal workspace when recursing, though recursive
 | |
| function calls are still used.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| The "match depth" parameter can be used to limit the depth of function
 | |
| recursion, and the "match heap" parameter to limit heap memory in
 | |
| <b>pcre2_dfa_match()</b>.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <br><a name="SEC4" href="#TOC1">PROCESSING TIME</a><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Certain items in regular expression patterns are processed more efficiently
 | |
| than others. It is more efficient to use a character class like [aeiou] than a
 | |
| set of single-character alternatives such as (a|e|i|o|u). In general, the
 | |
| simplest construction that provides the required behaviour is usually the most
 | |
| efficient. Jeffrey Friedl's book contains a lot of useful general discussion
 | |
| about optimizing regular expressions for efficient performance. This document
 | |
| contains a few observations about PCRE2.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Using Unicode character properties (the \p, \P, and \X escapes) is slow,
 | |
| because PCRE2 has to use a multi-stage table lookup whenever it needs a
 | |
| character's property. If you can find an alternative pattern that does not use
 | |
| character properties, it will probably be faster.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| By default, the escape sequences \b, \d, \s, and \w, and the POSIX
 | |
| character classes such as [:alpha:] do not use Unicode properties, partly for
 | |
| backwards compatibility, and partly for performance reasons. However, you can
 | |
| set the PCRE2_UCP option or start the pattern with (*UCP) if you want Unicode
 | |
| character properties to be used. This can double the matching time for items
 | |
| such as \d, when matched with <b>pcre2_match()</b>; the performance loss is
 | |
| less with a DFA matching function, and in both cases there is not much
 | |
| difference for \b.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| When a pattern begins with .* not in atomic parentheses, nor in parentheses
 | |
| that are the subject of a backreference, and the PCRE2_DOTALL option is set,
 | |
| the pattern is implicitly anchored by PCRE2, since it can match only at the
 | |
| start of a subject string. If the pattern has multiple top-level branches, they
 | |
| must all be anchorable. The optimization can be disabled by the
 | |
| PCRE2_NO_DOTSTAR_ANCHOR option, and is automatically disabled if the pattern
 | |
| contains (*PRUNE) or (*SKIP).
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| If PCRE2_DOTALL is not set, PCRE2 cannot make this optimization, because the
 | |
| dot metacharacter does not then match a newline, and if the subject string
 | |
| contains newlines, the pattern may match from the character immediately
 | |
| following one of them instead of from the very start. For example, the pattern
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   .*second
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| matches the subject "first\nand second" (where \n stands for a newline
 | |
| character), with the match starting at the seventh character. In order to do
 | |
| this, PCRE2 has to retry the match starting after every newline in the subject.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| If you are using such a pattern with subject strings that do not contain
 | |
| newlines, the best performance is obtained by setting PCRE2_DOTALL, or starting
 | |
| the pattern with ^.* or ^.*? to indicate explicit anchoring. That saves PCRE2
 | |
| from having to scan along the subject looking for a newline to restart at.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Beware of patterns that contain nested indefinite repeats. These can take a
 | |
| long time to run when applied to a string that does not match. Consider the
 | |
| pattern fragment
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   ^(a+)*
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| This can match "aaaa" in 16 different ways, and this number increases very
 | |
| rapidly as the string gets longer. (The * repeat can match 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4
 | |
| times, and for each of those cases other than 0 or 4, the + repeats can match
 | |
| different numbers of times.) When the remainder of the pattern is such that the
 | |
| entire match is going to fail, PCRE2 has in principle to try every possible
 | |
| variation, and this can take an extremely long time, even for relatively short
 | |
| strings.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| An optimization catches some of the more simple cases such as
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   (a+)*b
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| where a literal character follows. Before embarking on the standard matching
 | |
| procedure, PCRE2 checks that there is a "b" later in the subject string, and if
 | |
| there is not, it fails the match immediately. However, when there is no
 | |
| following literal this optimization cannot be used. You can see the difference
 | |
| by comparing the behaviour of
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   (a+)*\d
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| with the pattern above. The former gives a failure almost instantly when
 | |
| applied to a whole line of "a" characters, whereas the latter takes an
 | |
| appreciable time with strings longer than about 20 characters.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| In many cases, the solution to this kind of performance issue is to use an
 | |
| atomic group or a possessive quantifier. This can often reduce memory
 | |
| requirements as well. As another example, consider this pattern:
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   ([^<]|<(?!inet))+
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| It matches from wherever it starts until it encounters "<inet" or the end of
 | |
| the data, and is the kind of pattern that might be used when processing an XML
 | |
| file. Each iteration of the outer parentheses matches either one character that
 | |
| is not "<" or a "<" that is not followed by "inet". However, each time a
 | |
| parenthesis is processed, a backtracking position is passed, so this
 | |
| formulation uses a memory frame for each matched character. For a long string,
 | |
| a lot of memory is required. Consider now this rewritten pattern, which matches
 | |
| exactly the same strings:
 | |
| <pre>
 | |
|   ([^<]++|<(?!inet))+
 | |
| </pre>
 | |
| This runs much faster, because sequences of characters that do not contain "<"
 | |
| are "swallowed" in one item inside the parentheses, and a possessive quantifier
 | |
| is used to stop any backtracking into the runs of non-"<" characters. This
 | |
| version also uses a lot less memory because entry to a new set of parentheses
 | |
| happens only when a "<" character that is not followed by "inet" is encountered
 | |
| (and we assume this is relatively rare).
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| This example shows that one way of optimizing performance when matching long
 | |
| subject strings is to write repeated parenthesized subpatterns to match more
 | |
| than one character whenever possible.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <br><b>
 | |
| SETTING RESOURCE LIMITS
 | |
| </b><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| You can set limits on the amount of processing that takes place when matching,
 | |
| and on the amount of heap memory that is used. The default values of the limits
 | |
| are very large, and unlikely ever to operate. They can be changed when PCRE2 is
 | |
| built, and they can also be set when <b>pcre2_match()</b> or
 | |
| <b>pcre2_dfa_match()</b> is called. For details of these interfaces, see the
 | |
| <a href="pcre2build.html"><b>pcre2build</b></a>
 | |
| documentation and the section entitled
 | |
| <a href="pcre2api.html#matchcontext">"The match context"</a>
 | |
| in the
 | |
| <a href="pcre2api.html"><b>pcre2api</b></a>
 | |
| documentation.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| The <b>pcre2test</b> test program has a modifier called "find_limits" which, if
 | |
| applied to a subject line, causes it to find the smallest limits that allow a
 | |
| pattern to match. This is done by repeatedly matching with different limits.
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <br><a name="SEC5" href="#TOC1">AUTHOR</a><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Philip Hazel
 | |
| <br>
 | |
| University Computing Service
 | |
| <br>
 | |
| Cambridge, England.
 | |
| <br>
 | |
| </P>
 | |
| <br><a name="SEC6" href="#TOC1">REVISION</a><br>
 | |
| <P>
 | |
| Last updated: 03 February 2019
 | |
| <br>
 | |
| Copyright © 1997-2019 University of Cambridge.
 | |
| <br>
 | |
| <p>
 | |
| Return to the <a href="index.html">PCRE2 index page</a>.
 | |
| </p>
 |